Regulator demands details on Enbridge line reversal
* Enbridge sees demand for Portland-Montreal reversalBy Jeffrey JonesCALGARY, Alberta, Oct 17 (Reuters) - Canada’s energy
regulator has asked Enbridge Inc to explain whether a
proposed pipeline reversal is part of a bigger plan to export
crude, a concern expressed by environmental groups seeking a
more thorough review of the project.The National Energy Board has asked Enbridge to provide
more details of its Line 9 Phase 1 project, the initial part of
a plan to reverse the flow of its Montreal to Sarnia, Ontario,
oil pipeline to allow Quebec and Atlantic Canadian refineries
access to western crude.The board, which must decide on the level of review the
project is subject to, made the requests at the end of an
extended public comment period that attracted nearly 100
submissions from landowners, environmentalists, aboriginal
groups and oil companies.In a letter, the NEB asked Enbridge to explain by Oct. 21
the relationship between Phase 1, future stages and a
previously proposed plan called Trailbreaker, which would have
moved oil sands-derived crude to the U.S. Atlantic Seaboard.The NEB also wants to know if any of the phases is
dependent on another, as well as the current status of the
Trailbreaker project, which Enbridge floated three years ago,
regulatory documents show.It noted that many of the comment letters suggested
possible linkages between Phrase 1 and Trailbreaker.The C$17 million ($16.7 million) first phase, which
includes a reversal of flow between Sarnia and Westover,
Ontario, has become the latest target for environmental groups
opposed to development of the Alberta oil sands and
infrastructure aimed at moving the crude to more markets.Enbridge wants the project vetted under a section of the
NEB Act allowing for a less intensive review, saying the first
phase has minimal land disturbance and no adverse environmental
or socioeconomic impact.Green groups, led by Environmental Defence, want the board
to deny the exemption from a full review, arguing that Phase 1
is just the beginning of a resurrection of Trailbreaker, which
would have included a full reversal of the 240,000 barrel a day
Line 9, as well as a pipeline that runs to Montreal from
Portland, Maine, allowing oil to be loaded onto tankers.”This is a good step,” said Gillian McEachern, climate and
energy program manager for Environmental Defence.”It’s forcing some more transparency and accountability
about what the goal of the project is - and the game changes if
you’re looking at the impacts of the entire project that was
Trailbreaker versus the pipeline reversal in Ontario.”In its letter, the NEB said it wants Enbridge to provide
additional details “regarding the purpose of the project as it
relates to business demands of shippers and refiners, including
how they would benefit.”Earlier this month, Enbridge Chief Executive Pat Daniel
told Reuters that his company is seeking a deal to reverse the
flow of the Portland pipeline due to demand for light crude
from the Bakken region among Philadelphia-area refineries.